Waiting for clearer DfE guidance. Assuming the school is too small to be affected. Hoping the AI conversation goes away.
While leadership waits, teachers are already using AI tools — without training, without oversight, without anyone knowing what data those tools are processing.
Buying tools without governance. Deploying without training. Letting vendors make the decisions. Calling it an AI strategy.
AI tools not embedded in curriculum practice don't improve outcomes. They add complexity. When Ofsted asks how AI serves curriculum intent, there's no credible answer.
Every engagement begins with understanding your school. What we recommend depends on what we find — not on what's easiest to sell.
Bespoke policies aligned with DfE guidance, Ofsted expectations and UK GDPR — written for your school, not a generic template.
GDPR-compliant tool approval, DPIAs for every AI tool in use, and a governance framework that protects your school under ICO scrutiny.
Subject-specific, practical sessions that move teachers from anxious to capable. Not a one-day tick-box — practice that actually sticks.
Independent advisory on which AI tools genuinely serve your curriculum intent. We hold no financial interest in any tool we recommend.
AI embedded inside specific departments, mapped to EIF Intent → Implementation → Impact, with resources and evidence built alongside teachers.
Audit and redesign of your school's administrative systems — reducing hours spent on reporting, tracking and communication.
Eight questions. Three minutes. A readiness score, a plain-English interpretation, and a clear next step.
No commitment required before the call. The checker gives you a score. The call gives you a recommendation.
Eight questions. Three minutes. An AI readiness score and a plain-English interpretation of what it means for your school — no obligation.
A free 30-minute call where we discuss your score and what the right programme looks like for your school's context and budget.
The programme is designed around your school — not a generic template. We deliver the work, leave the materials, your school keeps the capability.
Pricing is discussed on your discovery call — after we understand your school's context and needs.
A full AI landscape audit — tools, policies, data protection, staff readiness and Ofsted alignment. Written report with prioritised roadmap.
AI policy drafted and adopted. Governance framework built. All staff trained. GDPR-compliant tool approval. Governor briefing document.
Full AI implementation across four curriculum departments. Embedded Staff AI Champions programme. ROI reporting. Ofsted evidence portfolio.
Consistent AI strategy, policy and training across all trust schools. Central leadership briefings, trust-wide benchmarking, dedicated advisory contact.
I've spent years at the intersection of technology and people operations — working across SaaS platforms, IoT deployments and customer success at scale. I understand what good implementation looks like. I know exactly how it fails.
I've engaged with teachers, headteachers, MAT directors and curriculum leads across the UK, West Africa, South Africa and Southeast Asia. What I hear consistently: schools are under pressure to act on AI and under-equipped to do it well.
I have no interest in recommending a tool that isn't right for your school. My value is the advice, the implementation, and the confidence your leadership team feels when Ofsted arrives.
The AI governance problem in schools doesn't stop at borders. Neither do we.
Deep Ofsted alignment, UK GDPR compliance, and sector fluency built through direct engagement with UK schools and MATs.
AI governance for K-12 districts navigating state legislation and FERPA — getting ahead of the regulatory environment.
International and private schools across Kenya, Ivory Coast and South Africa. Delivery available in English and French.
International school communities in Singapore and across the region — where AI adoption is fast and governance is lagging.